Synthesis Of High Quality Carbon Single-Walled Nanotubes

ABSTRACT

Methods and processes for synthesizing high quality carbon single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) are provided. A carbon precursor gas at reduced concentration (pressure) is contacted with a catalyst deposited on a support and at temperature about 10° C. above the SWNT synthesis onset temperature, but below the thermal decomposition temperature of the carbon precursor gas for given growth conditions. The concentration (pressure) of the carbon precursor gas can be controlled by reducing the total pressure of the gas, or by diluting with an inert carrier gas, or both. The methods produce SWNTs with the ratio of G-band to D-band in Raman spectra (I G :I D ) of about 5 to about 200.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods for the synthesis of carbonsingle-walled nanotubes using chemical vapor deposition method.

BACKGROUND

Carbon nanotubes are hexagonal networks of carbon atoms forming seamlesstubes with each end capped with half of a fullerene molecule. Presently,there are three main approaches for the synthesis of single- andmulti-walled carbon nanotubes. These include the electric arc dischargeof graphite rod (Journet et al. Nature 388: 756 (1997)), the laserablation of carbon (Thess et al. Science 273: 483 (1996)), and thechemical vapor deposition of hydrocarbons (Ivanov et al. Chem. Phys.Lett 223: 329 (1994); Li et al. Science 274: 1701 (1996)). Multi-walledcarbon nanotubes can be produced on a commercial scale by catalytichydrocarbon cracking while single-walled carbon nanotubes are stillproduced on a gram scale. Present methods produce both single-walled andmulti-walled carbon nanotubes, as well as other contaminants, andpurification of SWNTs can be time consuming and expensive.

Generally, single-walled carbon nanotubes are preferred overmulti-walled carbon nanotubes because they have unique mechanical andelectronic properties. Defects are less likely to occur in single-walledcarbon nanotubes because multi-walled carbon nanotubes can surviveoccasional defects by forming bridges between unsaturated carbonvalances, while single-walled carbon nanotubes have no neighboring wallsto compensate for defects. Defect-free single-walled nanotubes areexpected to have remarkable mechanical, electronic and magneticproperties that could be tunable by varying the diameter, and chiralityof the tube.

A method for the production of SWNTs is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.6,764,874 to Ruth Zhang et al. using thin nickel film, Fe/Co or Fe/Ni asthe catalyst. In addition, PCT Publication No. WO 06/050903 to SigurdBuchholz et al. discloses the use of Fe:Mo catalyst and the use ofhydrogen gas in order to generate the catalyst. These method can notproduce SWNTs on a commercial scale, and the quality of the SWNTs can below.

The methods described above still produce significant by-products and/orlow yields of SWNTs. Thus, there is a need for methods and processes forcontrollable synthesis of high quality carbon single walled nanotubes.Accordingly, the present invention provides novel methods and processesfor the synthesis of high quality SWNTs.

SUMMARY

The present invention provides methods and processes for growingsingle-walled carbon nanotubes with high quality.

The methods use catalysts selected from a Group V metal, a Group VImetal, a Group VII metal, a Group VIII metal, a lanthanide, or atransition metal or combinations thereof. The catalyst can be supportedon a powdered oxide, such as Al₂O₃, SiO₂, MgO and the like, wherein thecatalyst and the support are in a ratio of about 1:1 to about 1:500. Thesupported catalyst can be used for the synthesis of SWNTs. The reactiontemperature, the reaction duration, and other reaction conditions can bealtered until high-quality SWNTs are produced and the production ofother carbon species, such as multi-walled carbon nanotubes, amorphouscarbon, disordered carbon, or graphite is minimized.

In one aspect, the invention provides methods for synthesizing carbonsingle-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) wherein Fe:Mo metal catalyst issupported on alumina and contacted with a carbon precursor gas tosynthesize high quality SWNTs wherein the hydrocarbon concentration isreduced. The reaction temperature is preferably less than the thermaldecomposition temperature of the carbon precursor gas, and greater thanthe onset temperature of the SWNT synthesis under the given synthesisconditions.

In another aspect, the invention provides methods for synthesizingcarbon single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) wherein metal catalyst on asupport in a ratio of about 1:10 to about 1:50 are contacted with acarbon precursor gas and high quality SWNTs are synthesized at atemperature of less than the thermal decomposition temperature of thecarbon source, and wherein the pressure of the carbon precursor gas inthe reaction chamber is less than about 200 torr.

In another aspect, the invention provides methods for synthesizingcarbon single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs) wherein metal catalyst on asupport in a ratio of about 1:10 to about 1:50 are contacted with acarbon precursor gas and high quality SWNTs are synthesized at atemperature of less than the thermal decomposition temperature of thecarbon source, and wherein the carbon precursor gas is diluted with acarrier gas such that the partial pressure of the carbon source is lessthan about 200 torr, and the reaction is carried out at about atmospherepressure.

These and other aspects of the present invention will become evidentupon reference to the following detailed description. In addition,various references are set forth herein which describe in more detailcertain procedures or compositions, and are therefore incorporated byreference in their entirety.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts the temperature dependence of hydrogen evolution duringthe synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes using pure carbon sourceat different pressures.

FIG. 2 depicts the temperature dependence of hydrogen evolution duringthe synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes using carbon sourcediluted with a carrier gas at atmospheric pressure.

FIG. 3 depicts the Raman spectra of carbon SWNTs grown using the purecarbon source at different pressures.

FIG. 4 depicts the Raman spectra of carbon SWNTs grown using carbonsource diluted with a carrier gas at atmospheric pressure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION I. Definitions

Unless otherwise stated, the following terms used in this application,including the specification and claims, have the definitions givenbelow. It must be noted that, as used in the specification and theappended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include pluralreferents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Definition ofstandard chemistry terms may be found in reference works, includingCarey and Sundberg (1992) “Advanced Organic Chemistry 3^(rd) Ed.” Vols.A and B, Plenum Press, New York, and Cotton et al. (1999) “AdvancedInorganic Chemistry 6^(th) Ed.” Wiley, New York.

The terms “single-walled carbon nanotube” or “one-dimensional carbonnanotube” are used interchangeable and refer to cylindrically shapedthin sheet of carbon atoms having a wall consisting essentially of asingle layer of carbon atoms, and arranged in an hexagonal crystallinestructure with a graphitic type of bonding.

The terms “metalorganic” or “organometallic” are used interchangeablyand refer to co-ordination compounds of organic compounds and a metal, atransition metal or a metal halide.

II. Overview

The present invention discloses methods and processes for the synthesisof high quality carbon single-wall nanotubes (SWNT) and structures usingthe carbon vapor deposition method. Catalyst supported on powdered Al₂O₃is used for the synthesis of SWNTs. The catalyst preferably is Fe and atleast one other metal, such as Mo, Ni, and the like. The synthesis ispreferably carried out at reduced concentration of the hydrocarbonprecursor gas, and the temperature of the reaction is selected such thatit is below the thermal decomposition temperature of the hydrocarbonprecursor gas but is higher than the onset temperature of the SWNTsynthesis by about 10° C. to about 50° C. The methods thus minimize thethermal decomposition, thereby minimizing the formation of amorphous ordisordered carbon and the formation of multi-layered carbon. Thus, highquality SWNTs are produced.

III. The Catalyst

The catalyst composition can be any catalyst composition known to thoseof skill in the art. Conveniently, the catalyst can be a metal or analloy, such as, for example, iron, iron oxide, molybdenum, or a ferritesuch as cobalt, nickel, chromium, yttrium, hafnium or manganese. Thecatalyst useful according to the invention will preferably have anaverage overall particle size of up to 5 nm to about 1 μnm, although, ingeneral, the particle sizes for individual particles can be from about 1μnm to about 5 nm.

The function of the catalyst when used in the carbon nanotube growthprocess is to decompose the carbon precursors and aid the deposition ofordered carbon. The methods and processes of the present inventionpreferably use metal nanoparticles as the metallic catalyst. The metalor combination of metals selected as the catalyst can be processed toobtain the desired particle size and diameter distribution. The catalystcan then be separated by being supported on a material suitable for useas a support during synthesis of carbon nanotubes as described below. Asknown in the art, the support can be used to separate the catalystparticles from each other thereby providing the catalyst materials withgreater surface area in the catalyst composition. Such support materialsinclude powders of crystalline silicon, polysilicon, silicon nitride,tungsten, magnesium, aluminum and their oxides, preferably aluminumoxide, silicon oxide, magnesium oxide, or titanium dioxide, orcombination thereof, optionally modified by additional elements, areused as support powders. Silica, alumina and other materials known inthe art may be used as support, preferably alumina is used as thesupport.

The catalyst can be selected from a Group V metal, such as V or Nb, andmixtures thereof, a Group VI metal including Cr, W, or Mo, and mixturesthereof, VII metal, such as, Mn, or Re, Group VIII metal including Co,Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt, and mixtures thereof, or the lanthanides,such as Ce, Eu, Er, or Yb and mixtures thereof, or transition metalssuch as Cu, Ag, Au, Zn, Cd, Sc, Y, or La and mixtures thereof Specificexamples of mixture of catalysts, such as bimetallic catalysts, whichmay be employed by the present invention include Co—Cr, Co—W, Co—Mo,Ni—Cr, Ni—W, Ni—Mo, Ru—Cr, Ru—W, Ru—Mo, Rh—Cr, Rh—W, Rh—Mo, Pd—Cr, Pd—W,Pd—Mo, Ir—Cr, Pt—Cr, Pt—W, and Pt—Mo. Preferably, the metal catalyst isiron, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, or a mixture thereof, such as Fe—Mo,Fe—Ni and Ni—Fe—Mo.

The ratio of each metal to the total catalyst is preferably from about1:10 to about 15:1 (mol/mol), more preferably about 1:5 to about 5:1(mol/mol), and even more preferably about 1:2 to about 1:4 (mol/mol).Thus, for example, if the catalyst is the bimetallic Fe—Mo, the ratio ofFe:Mo can be 1:1, 2:3, 1:2, 3:2, 5:1, 6:1 and the like. Similarly, ifthe catalyst is the trimetallic Fe—Mo—Ni, the ratio of Fe:Mo:Ni can be1:1:1, 3:2:1, 5:1:1, 10:2:1, and the like.

The metal, bimetal, or combination of metals can be used to prepare thecatalyst as nanoparticles, preferably having defined particle size anddiameter distribution. The catalyst can be prepared using the literatureprocedure described in Harutyunyan et al., NanoLetters 2, 525 (2002).Alternatively, the catalyst can be prepared by thermal decomposition ofthe corresponding metal salt added to a passivating salt, and thetemperature of the solvent adjusted to provide the metal nanoparticles,as described in the co-pending and co-owned U.S. patent application Ser.No. 10/304,316, or by any other method known in the art. The size anddiameter of the catalyst can be controlled by using the appropriateconcentration of metal in the passivating solvent and by controlling thelength of time the reaction is allowed to proceed at the thermaldecomposition temperature. The metal salt can be any salt of the metal,and can be selected such that the melting point of the metal salt islower than the boiling point of the passivating solvent. Thus, the metalsalt contains the metal ion and a counter ion, where the counter ion canbe nitrate, nitride, perchlorate, sulfate, sulfide, acetate, halide,oxide, such as methoxide or ethoxide, acetylacetonate, and the like. Forexample, the metal salt can be iron acetate (FeAc₂), nickel acetate(NiAc₂), palladium acetate (PdAc₂), molybdenum acetate (MoAc₃), and thelike, and combinations thereof The melting point of the metal salt ispreferably about 5° C. to 50° C. lower than the boiling point, morepreferably about 5° C. to about 20° C. lower than the boiling point ofthe passivating solvent. The solvent can be an ether, such as a glycolether, 2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol, H(OCH₂CH₂)₂O(CH₂)₃CH₃, which will bereferred to below using the common name dietheylene glycol mono-n-butylether, and the like.

Catalysts having an average particle size of about 0.01 nm to about 20nm, more preferably about 0.1 nm to about 3 nm and most preferably about0.3 nm to 2 nm can be prepared. The catalysts can thus have a particlesize of 0.1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 nm, and up to about 20 nm.In another aspect, the catalysts can have a range of particle size, ordiameter distribution. For example, the catalysts can have particlesizes in the range of about 0.1 nm and about 5 nm in size, about 3 nmand about 7 nm in size, or about 5 nm and about 11 nm in size.

The size and distribution of catalyst produced can be verified by anysuitable method. One method of verification is transmission electronmicroscopy (TEM). A suitable model is the Phillips CM300 FEG TEM that iscommercially available from FEI Company of Hillsboro, Oreg. In order totake TEM micrographs of the metal nanoparticles, 1 or more drops of themetal nanoparticle/passivating solvent solution are placed on a carbonmembrane grid or other grid suitable for obtaining TEM micrographs. TheTEM apparatus is then used to obtain micrographs of the nanoparticlesthat can be used to determine the distribution of nanoparticle sizescreated.

In another method, the size of the catalyst particle, before and afterbeing supported, can be determined using superconducting quantuminterference device (SQUID) magnetometer, as described in the co-pendingand co-owned application U.S. Ser. No. 10/992,275. SQUID magnetometersare commercially available from companies such as BiomagneticTechnologies Inc., San Diego, Calif. and Siemens AG of Germany, andinclude both single and multichannel devices that are capable ofdetecting magnetic fields at plurality of locations simultaneously.SQUID magnetometers generally comprise a superconducting pick up coilsystem and a detector system (the SQUID) which itself comprises one ortwo Josephson junctions inserted into a loop of superconducting wire.The magnetic flux within such loops is quantized and changes in themagnetic field experienced by the pick up coils cause a measurablechange in the current flowing through the detector. The SQUIDmagnetometers are capable of measuring very low magnetic fields, forexample, as low as 10⁻¹⁴ Tesla. The technique thus finds use in avariety of fields.

It has been found that the magnetization curves for catalysts havingparticle sizes of less than about 1.5 nm is paramagnetic, and themagnetization curves for particle sizes greater than about 2 nm issuperparamagnetic, and greater than 4 nm is ferromagnetic Thus, in oneaspect, the evolution of magnetic properties of the catalyst particlescan be used for verification of the catalyst particle size after thesynthesis. The metal/support material molar ratio can be varied if themagnetization curves observed in SQUID are not the same as themagnetization curves expected for the desired particle sizes. Thus, ifthe desired average particle size is about 2 nm or greater, such asbetween 2.1 nm and about 3 nm, then the variation of the metal/supportmaterial ratio is continued until the SQUID measurements providemagnetization curves indicating that the particles aresuperparamagnetic.

The catalysts, such as those formed by thermal decomposition describedin detail above, and optionally characterized by SQUID, can then besupported on solid supports. The solid support can be alumina, silica,MCM-41, MgO, ZrO₂, aluminum-stabilized magnesium oxide, zeolites, orother oxidic supports known in the art, and combinations thereof. Forexample, Al₂O₃—SiO₂ hybrid support could be used. Preferably, thesupport is aluminum oxide (Al₂O₃) or silica (SiO₂). The oxide used assolid support can be powdered thereby providing small particle sizes andlarge surface areas. The powdered oxide can preferably have a particlesize between about 0.01 μm to about 100 μm, more preferably about 0.1 μmto about 10 μm, even more preferably about 0.5 μm to about 5 μm, andmost preferably about 1 μm to about 2 μm. The powdered oxide can have asurface area of about 50 to about 1000 m²/g, more preferably a surfacearea of about 200 to about 800 m²/g. The powdered oxide can be freshlyprepared or commercially available.

In one aspect, the catalysts are supported on solid supports viasecondary dispersion and extraction. Secondary dispersion begins byintroducing particles of a powdered oxide, such as aluminum oxide(Al₂O₃) or silica (SiO₂), into the reaction vessel after the thermaldecomposition reaction. A suitable Al₂O₃ powder with 1-2 μm particlesize and having a surface area of 300-500 m²/g is commercially availablefrom Alfa Aesar of Ward Hill, Mass., or Degussa, N.J. Powdered oxide canbe added to achieve a desired weight ratio between the initial amount ofthe catalyst and the powdered oxide used to form the supportedcatalysts. Typically, the weight ratio can be between about 1:10 andabout 1:50. For example, if 100 mg of iron acetate is used as thestarting catalyst material, then about 320 to 480 mg of powdered oxidecan be introduced into the solution. The weight ratio of catalyst topowdered oxide can be between about 1:10 and 1:20, such as, for example,1:11, 1:12, 2:25, 3:37, 1:13, 1:14, 1:15, 1:16, 1:17, and the like.

As will be apparent to those of skill in the art, the supported catalystthus prepared can be stored for later use. In another aspect, thecatalyst can be previously prepared, isolated from the passivatingsolvent, and purified, and then added to a powdered oxide in a suitablevolume of the same or different passivating solvent. The metalnanoparticles and powdered oxide can be homogenously dispersed,extracted from the passivating solvent, and processed to increase theeffective surface area as described above. Other methods for preparingthe metal nanoparticles and powdered oxide mixture will be apparent tothose skilled in the art.

The supported catalysts thus formed can be used as a growth catalyst forsynthesis of carbon nanotubes, nanofibers, and other one-dimensionalcarbon nanostructures using the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process.

IV. Carbon Precursors

The carbon nanotubes can be synthesized using carbon precursors, such ascarbon containing gases. In general, any carbon containing gas that doesnot pyrolize at temperatures up to 800° C. to 1200° C. can be used forgive flow rate. Examples of suitable carbon-containing gases includecarbon monoxide, aliphatic hydrocarbons, both saturated and unsaturated,such as methane, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, hexane, ethylene,acetylene and propylene; oxygenated hydrocarbons such as acetone, andmethanol; aromatic hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, andnaphthalene; and mixtures of the above, for example carbon monoxide andmethane. In general, the use of acetylene promotes formation ofmulti-walled carbon nanotubes, while CO and methane are preferred feedgases for formation of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Thecarbon-containing gas may optionally be mixed with a diluent gas such ashydrogen, helium, argon, neon, krypton and xenon or a mixture thereof.

V. Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes

The methods and processes of the invention provide for the synthesis ofSWNTs having high quality. In one aspect of the invention, the catalystsupported on powdered oxides can be contacted with the carbon source atthe reaction temperatures according to the literature methods describedin Harutyunyan et al., NanoLetters 2, 525 (2002). Alternatively, thecatalysts supported on the oxide powder can be aerosolized andintroduced into the reactor maintained at the reaction temperature.Concurrently, the carbon precursor gas can be introduced into thereactor. The flow of reactants within the reactor can be controlled suchthat the deposition of the carbon products on the walls of the reactoris reduced. The carbon nanotubes thus produced can be collected andseparated.

The catalysts supported on the oxide powder can be aerosolized by any ofthe art known methods. In one method, the supported catalysts areaerosolized using an inert gas, such as helium, neon, argon, krypton,xenon, or radon. Preferably argon is used. Typically, argon, or anyother gas, is forced through a particle injector, and into the reactor.The particle injector can be any vessel that is capable of containingthe supported catalysts and that has a means of agitating the supportedcatalysts. Thus, the catalyst deposited on a powdered porous oxidesubstrate can be placed in a beaker that has a mechanical stirrerattached to it. The supported catalyst can be stirred or mixed in orderto assist the entrainment of the catalyst in the transporter gas, suchas argon.

Thus, the nanotube synthesis generally occurs as described in theco-pending and co-owned application U.S. Ser. No. 10/727,707, filed onDec. 3, 2003. An inert transporter gas, preferably argon gas, isgenerally passed through a particle injector. The particle injector canbe a beaker or other vessel containing the growth catalyst supported ona powdered porous oxide substrate. The supported catalyst in theparticle injector can be stirred or mixed in order to assist theentrainment of the supported catalyst in the argon gas flow. Optionally,the inert gas can be passed through a drying system to dry the gas. Theargon gas, with the entrained powdered porous oxide, can then be passedthrough a pre-heater to raise the temperature of this gas flow to about400° C. to about 500° C. The entrained supported catalyst can then bedelivered to the reaction chamber.

In one aspect of the invention, the carbon source gas, such as methaneor carbon monoxide, is delivered to the reaction chamber at reducedpressure. The pressure of the carbon source gas can be about 0.01 torrto about 600 torr, preferably about 5 torr to about 200 torr. Thepressure is selected such that the decomposition of the carbon sourceoccurs at temperatures above about 825° C., more preferably attemperatures above about 850° C., or more preferably at temperaturesabove about 875° C. For example, when the carbon source is methane, andthe catalyst is Fe:Mo:Al₂O₃ (1:0.2:40), the onset of the decompositionof methane begins at 760° C. at 780 torr pressure (1.025 atm), at785-800° C. at 180 torr (0.24 atm), and at 825° C. at 5.6 torr (0.0074atm). Thus, decreasing the hydrocarbon concentration by using reducedpressure results in an increase in the synthesis temperature, therebyproducing higher quality SWNTs. Thus, in one aspect of the invention,the carbon source gas can be delivered at a reduced pressure such thatthe temperature is less than about 1000° C., but the onset temperatureof the SWNT nucleation is increased over the onset temperature atatmospheric pressure by at least about 15° C., more preferably about 25°C., or even more preferably about 30° C.

In another aspect of the invention, the carbon source gas, such asmethane, can be mixed with another gas and then delivered to thereaction chamber, preferably at about atmosphere pressure (750 torr).For example, the ratio of partial pressures of the carbon source gas tothe inert gas can be about 1:500 to about 1:1, preferably about 1:100 toabout 1:10, or more preferably about 1:50 to about 1:12. Thus thepressure can be about 0.9 to about 1.5 atmosphere, preferably about 1 toabout 1.1 atmosphere, or more preferably about 1.0 to about 1.05atmosphere. Thus, typical flow rates can be 200 sccm for argon or heliumand 5 sccm for methane, to give a total pressure of 1.025 atmospheres(780 torr) for the synthesis of higher quality SWNTs.

The temperature of the reaction chamber can be selected to be betweenabout 300° C. and 900° C. The temperature can be selected such that itis preferably kept below the decomposition temperature of the carbonprecursor gas. For example, at temperatures above 1000° C., methane isknown to break down directly into soot rather than forming carbonnanostructures with the metal growth catalyst. Further, the temperaturecan be selected such that the formation of non-SWNT products, such asamorphous or disordered carbon, graphite, or multi-walled carbonnanotubes, is minimized. Carbon nanotubes and other carbonnanostructures synthesized in reaction chamber can then be collected andcharacterized. Thus, when the concentration of the carbon source isreduced by dilution with argon, the onset temperature was found to be785° C. and when the concentration of the carbon source is reduced bydilution with helium, the onset temperature was found to be 795° C.

In one aspect of the invention, the diameter distribution of thesynthesized SWNTs is substantially uniform. Thus, about 90% of the SWNTshave a diameter within about 25% of the mean diameter, more preferably,within about 20% of the mean diameter, and even more preferably, withinabout 15% of the mean diameter. Thus, the diameter distribution of thesynthesized SWNTs can be about 10% to about 25% within the meandiameter, more preferably about 10% to about 20% of the mean diameter,and even more preferably about 10% to about 15% of the mean diameter.

Carbon SWNTs can be synthesized with the yields ranging from about 1 wt% to about 100 wt % (wt % carbon relative to the iron/alumina catalyst).Analysis of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of SWNTsproduced can be correlated with the size of the catalyst particles. Forexample, SWNTs can be produced as bundles having an average diameter ofabout 10 nm to about 15 nm when catalyst particle size is about 9 nm,having an average diameter of about 7 nm to about 12 nm when catalystparticle size is about 5 nm, and having an average diameter about 5 nmto about 10 nm when catalyst particle size is about 1 nm. The diametersestimated from TEM can be confirmed from the radial breathing modesobserved by Raman Spectroscopy spectra, using multiple different laserexcitations, such as, for example, λ=1064; 785; 614, 532, 514 and 488nm.

The Raman spectra of SWNTs has three major peaks, which are the G-bandat about 1590 cm⁻¹, D-band at about 1350 cm⁻¹, and the Radial breathingmode (RBM) at about 100-300 cm⁻¹. RBM frequency is proportional to aninverse of the diameter of SWNTs and can thus be used to calculate thediameter of the SWNT. Normally, a red shift in RBM peak corresponds toan increase in the mean diameter of SWNTs. The tangential mode G-bandrelated to the Raman-allowed phonon mode E_(2g) can be a superpositionof two peaks. The double peak at about 1593 and 1568 cm⁻¹ has beenassigned to semiconductor SWNTs, while the broad Breit-Wigner-Fano lineat about 1550 cm⁻¹ has been assigned to metallic SWNTs. Thus, G-bandoffers a method for distinguishing between metallic and semiconductingSWNTs. The D-band structure is related to disordered carbon, thepresence of amorphous carbon, and other defects due to the sp²-carbonnetwork. The ratio of the G-band to D-band in the Raman spectra(I_(G):I_(D) or G/D ratio) of SWNTs can be used as an index to determinethe purity and quality of the SWNTs produced. Preferably, I_(G):I_(D) isabout 1 to about 500, preferably about 5 to about 400, more preferablygreater than about 7.

The concentration of the carbon source in the reaction chamber andreaction duration can be varied to obtain SWNTs of high quality. Forexample, the reaction temperature can be from about 400° C. to about950° C., preferably from about 750° C. to about 900° C., or morepreferably from about from about 800° C. to about 875° C. The SWNTsproduced at the initial setting can be tested for their quality, and thetemperature adjusted such that the quality of SWNTs reaches the desiredlevel. Preferably, the reaction temperature is between about 800° C. and900° C., and the reaction duration is from about 1 min to about 180 min,preferably from about 10 min to about 120 min, more preferably fromabout 10 min to about 100 min. The quality of the SWNTs produced can betested, and the reaction duration adjusted such that the quality ofSWNTs reaches the desired level. Preferably, the reaction duration isless than about 90 min.

Using the methods and processes of the invention, high quality SWNTswith I_(G):I_(D) of about 4 to about 500 can be manufactured. Thequality of the SWNTs can be controlled by controlling the particle sizeof the catalyst, the temperature of the reaction, the duration of thereaction, and the concentration of the carbon source gas. In particular,the concentration of the carbon source is decreased such that the onsettemperature is increased to about 800° C. to about 900° C., where theconcentration can be decreased by either reducing the pressure of thepure carbon source or by diluting the carbon source with an inert gas.The SWNTs thus produced are of greater purity and quality.

The carbon nanotubes and nanostructures produced by the methods andprocesses described above can be used in applications that include FieldEmission Devices, Memory devices (high-density memory arrays, memorylogic switching arrays), Nano-MEMs, AFM imaging probes, distributeddiagnostics sensors, and strain sensors. Other key applications include:thermal control materials, super strength and light weight reinforcementand nanocomposites, EMI shielding materials, catalytic support, gasstorage materials, high surface area electrodes, and light weightconductor cable and wires, and the like.

EXAMPLES

Below are examples of specific embodiments for carrying out the presentinvention. The examples are offered for illustrative purposes only, andare not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way.Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers used(e.g., amounts, temperatures, etc.), but some experimental error anddeviation should, of course, be allowed for.

Example 1 Preparation of the Supported Catalyst

Alumina aerogel supported bimetallic Fe/Mo catalyst (with molar ratioFe:Mo:Al₂O₃ of 1:0.2:10.16) was prepared using the sol-gel methodfollowed by supercritical drying. 5.28 g of aluminum sec-butoxide (97%,Alfa Aesar) was diluted in 35 ml of heated 200 proof ethanol and then 20ml of 4 μg/ml of HNO₃ solution in ethanol was added. The mixture wasrefluxed at 80° C. with stirring for 2 hours. Then a solution of 426.5mg of iron (III) nitrate hydrate (99.999%, Puratronic by Alfa Aesar) and68.7 mg of molybdenum (VI) oxide bis(2,4-pentanedionate) (99%, AlfaAesar) in 20 ml of ethanol was added. The mixture was refluxed at 80° C.with stirring for 1 hour and then cooled to room temperature. To theroom temperature solution was added a solution of 1 ml of ammoniumhydroxide (trace metal grade, Fisher) and 1 ml of distilled water in 5ml of ethanol, under intensive stirring that caused gelation. The gelwas left to age overnight and supercritically dried at 270° C. and >100atm the following day. The aerogel powder was calcinated in air flow at500° C. for 1 hour and heat-treated in argon flow at 820° C. for 1 hour.

The catalyst was also be prepared using the method described inHarutyunyan et al., NanoLetters 2, 525 (2002). Alternatively, thecatalyst was prepared by impregnating support materials in metal saltsolutions. The reaction time and metal salt/glycol ratio were changed tocontrol the sizes of nanoparticles. In a typical procedure, FeAc₂ inmethanol and MoAc₂ in methanol were used at a molar ratio of Fe:Mo:Al₂O₃of 1:0.2:17. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, FeAc₂ and MoAc₂ were added todietheylene glycol mono-n-butyl ether in the molar ratio of 1 mM:0.2mM:20 mM. The reaction mixture was mixed under the nitrogen atmosphereusing a magnetic stir bar, and heated under reflux for 90 minutes. Thereaction mixture was then cooled to room temperature, and Al₂O₃ (17 mM)was added at once (molar ratio Fe:Mo:Al₂O₃=1:0.2:17). The reactionsolution was stirred at room temperature for 15 minutes, and then heatedto 150° C. for 3 hours. The reaction was cooled to 90° C. while flowinga stream of N₂ over the mixture to remove the solvent. A black filmformed on the walls of the reaction flask. The black film was collectedand ground with an agate mortar to obtain a fine black powder.

Example 2 Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes

Carbon nanotubes were synthesized by using the experimental setupdescribed in Harutyunyan et al., NanoLetters 2, 525 (2002). CVD growthof SWNTs with the catalysts produced above used methane as a carbonsource. The single-walled carbon nanotubes thus produced werecharacterized using Raman spectra of carbon SWNTs using λ=532 nm laserexcitation. In general, high concentration of the methane resulted in avery significant thermal decomposition of methane and heavycontamination of the reactor walls with carbon. Decrease of the methaneconcentration reduced this contamination. D-band of the Raman spectra ofthe synthesized nanotube material also decreased with the decrease ofthe methane concentration indicating decrease of the portion ofamorphous carbon.

The reaction was carried out using 1:0.2:40 (Fe:Mo:Al₂O₃) aerogelcatalyst and methane as the carbon source. The concentration of methanein the reaction chamber was manipulated using different pressures, asillustrated in FIG. 1. The use of 100% methane at 780 torr pressure(1.025 atm) resulted in methane starting to decompose at 760° C. Whenthe pressure was decreased to 180 torr (0.24 atm), methane begandecomposing at 785-800° C., and when the pressure was decreased to 5.6torr (0.0074 atm), methane began decomposing at 825° C. The use ofdifferent heating rates did not affect the onset of decompositiontemperature. A heating rate of 1 C/min (815 C and 840 C for 6 torr) and5 C/min (825 C for 5.6 torr) show comparable onset temperatures. Thequality of the SWNTs produced at these different pressures is shown inFIG. 3, and is consistent with the synthesis of high quality of SWNTs.

Example 3 Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes

Carbon nanotubes were synthesized and characterized as described inExample 2, except the concentration of the carbon source was controlledby the addition of an inert gas and the reaction was performed atatmospheric pressure.

The concentration of methane in the reaction chamber was manipulated bymixing methane with either argon or helium, as illustrated in FIG. 2.For the mixture of 180 torr methane and 600 torr argon (total pressure780 torr=1.025 atm, 60 sccm CH₄+200 sccm Ar), the onset temperature was785° C. while for the mixture of 180 torr methane and 600 torr helium(total pressure 780 torr=1.025 atm, 60 sccm CH₄+200 sccm He) the onsettemperature was 795° C. Both onset temperatures are comparable to thatof the 180 torr pure methane.

The flow rates of the gas mixtures were reduced 5 fold (from 260 sccm to52 sccm), but the proportion of the gases, and, thus, their partialpressures were maintained (12 sccm CH₄+40 sccm of Ar, total pressure 780torr), the onset temperatures was 793° C., the same as that of the 260sccm experiment. Thus, the flow rate does not signigicantly affect theonset of the decomposition temperature.

Further dilution of the methane with the carrier gas (8 sccm CH₄+100sccm Ar or He, 780 torr total pressure) lead to increase of the onsettemperatures to 830° C. for Ar and 835° C. for He, comparable to theonset temperature for 6 torr pure methane (825° C.). Thus, the onsettemperature seems to depend mostly on the concentration (partialpressure) of the carbon source (methane), regardless of the method ofcreating the concentration (pumping out or dilution with the carriergas). The nature of the carrier gas (Ar, He, “vacuum”) does not seems tohave a significant effect on the onset temperature. The change of theflow rate (within the tested limits) also has little effect on the onsettemperature. The quality of the SWNTs produced at these differentpressures is shown in FIG. 4, and is consistent with the synthesis ofhigh quality of SWNTs.

Therefore, higher quality SWCNT can be synthesized using CVD at lowconcentrations of carbon source (methane). The method has the advantageof reducing the portion of amorphous carbon and produces less defectiveSWNT since they are synthesized at higher temperatures.

While the invention has been particularly shown and described withreference to a preferred embodiment and various alternate embodiments,it will be understood by persons skilled in the relevant art thatvarious changes in form and details can be made therein withoutdeparting from the spirit and scope of the invention. All printedpatents and publications referred to in this application are herebyincorporated herein in their entirety by this reference.

1. A method for synthesizing carbon single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs), themethod comprising: contacting supported metal catalyst with a carbonprecursor gas at a pressure of about 0.01 torr to about 200 torr and atemperature between about 600° C. and 1200° C. wherein SWNTs aresynthesized with a ratio of G-band to D-band in Raman spectra(I_(G):I_(D)) of greater than about 100, and the total pressure is about740 torr to about 780 torr.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein thecatalyst is selected from the group consisting of a Group V metal, aGroup VI metal, a Group VII metal, a Group VIII metal, a lanthanide, anda transition metal, or mixtures thereof.
 3. The method of claim 2,wherein the catalyst is Fe and another metal selected from the groupconsisting of V, Nb, Cr, W, Mo, Mn, Re, Co, Ni, Ru, Rh, Pd, Os, Ir, Pt,Ce, Eu, Er, Yb, Ag, Au, Zn, Cd, Sc, Y, and La or mixtures thereof. 4.The method of claim 3, wherein the catalyst is Fe and Ni, Co, Cr, or Mo,and combinations thereof.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the catalystis Fe—Mo.
 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the support is a powderedoxide.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the powdered oxide is oxide isselected from the group consisting of Al₂O₃, SiO₂, MgO and zeolites. 8.The method of claim 7, wherein the powdered oxide is Al₂O₃.
 9. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the catalyst and the support are in a ratioof about 1:1 to about 1:500.
 10. The method of claim 9, wherein theratio is about 1:10 to about 1:20.
 11. The method of claim 1, whereinthe carbon precursor gas is selected from the group consisting ofmethane, ethane, propane, butane, pentane, hexane, ethylene, acetylene,propylene, acetone, and methanol
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein thecarbon precursor gas is methane.
 13. The method of claim 11, wherein thecarbon precursor gas further comprises an inert gas.
 14. The method ofclaim 13, wherein the inert gas is argon, helium, nitrogen, orcombinations thereof.
 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the synthesisis under reduced pressure.
 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the ratioof I_(G):I_(D) is less than
 100. 17. The method of claim 16, wherein theratio of I_(G):I_(D) is about 5 to about
 30. 18. A method forsynthesizing carbon single-walled nanotubes (SWNTs), the methodcomprising: contacting metal catalyst on a support in a ratio of about1:10 to about 1:40 with a carbon precursor gas at a pressure of about0.01 torr to about 200 torr and a temperature between about 600° C. and900° C., wherein SWNTs are synthesized with a ratio of G-band to D-bandin Raman spectra (I_(G):I_(D)) of greater than 5, and wherein the metalcatalyst is Fe—Mo and the total pressure is about 740 torr to about 780torr.
 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the support is a powderedoxide.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the powdered oxide is oxideis selected from the group consisting of Al₂O₃, SiO₂, MgO and zeolites.21. The method of claim 20, wherein the powdered oxide is Al₂O₃.
 22. Themethod of claim 18, wherein the carbon precursor gas is selected fromthe group consisting of methane, ethane, propane, butane, pentane,hexane, ethylene, acetylene, propylene, acetone, and methanol
 23. Themethod of claim 22, wherein the carbon precursor gas is methane.
 24. Themethod of claim 22, wherein the carbon precursor gas further comprisesan inert gas.
 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the inert gas isargon, helium, nitrogen, hydrogen, or combinations thereof.
 26. Themethod of claim 18, wherein the ratio of I_(G):I_(D) is less than 100.27. The method of claim 26, wherein the ratio of I_(G):I_(D) is about 5to about 30.